Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 55591
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T17:24:05+00:00 2026-05-10T17:24:05+00:00

He’re an interesting problem that looks for the most Pythonic solution. Suppose I have

  • 0

He’re an interesting problem that looks for the most Pythonic solution. Suppose I have a list of mappings {'id': id, 'url': url}. Some ids in the list are duplicate, and I want to create a new list, with all the duplicates removed. I came up with the following function:

def unique_mapping(map):     d = {}     for res in map:         d[res['id']] = res['url']      return [{'id': id, 'url': d[id]} for id in d] 

I suppose it’s quite efficient. But is there a ‘more Pythonic’ way ? Or perhaps a more efficient way ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T17:24:05+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 5:24 pm

    Your example can be rewritten slightly to construct the first dictionary using a generator expression and to remove necessity of construction of another mappings. Just reuse the old ones:

    def unique_mapping(mappings):     return dict((m['id'], m) for m in mappings).values() 

    Although this came out as a one-liner, I still think it’s quite readable.

    There are two things you have to keep in mind when using your original solution and mine:

    • the items will not always be returned in the same order they were originally
    • the later entry will overwrite previous entries with the same id

    If you don’t mind, then I suggest the solution above. In other case, this function preserves order and treats first-encountered ids with priority:

    def unique_mapping(mappings):     addedIds = set()     for m in mappings:         mId = m['id']         if mId not in addedIds:             addedIds.add(mId)             yield m 

    You might need to call it with list(unique_mappings(mappings)) if you need a list and not a generator.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 67k
  • Answers 67k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Games.find( :all, :limit => 5, :include => [:games, :requests], :group… May 11, 2026 at 11:52 am
  • added an answer Yes, that should be posible with some modification. Instead of… May 11, 2026 at 11:52 am
  • added an answer If you're not ashamed of monkeypatching and abusing syntax, this… May 11, 2026 at 11:52 am

Related Questions

He're an interesting problem that looks for the most Pythonic solution. Suppose I have
He want's to know our opinions on whether we should have flexitime, allow non-work
In @mmalc's response to this question he states that In general you should not
My PM just stopped by and he wanted a copy of all of our
I need an encoder that can convert mp3 files to he-aac (aka aac+). So
I came across a printed article by Bertrand Meyer where he states that tests
A friend of mine brought up this questiont he other day, he's recently bought
I talked to a friend of mine and he told me that it's possible
We developed a website for a client and he has purchased the .com, .net,
This error message appears on a colleague's machine when he tries to launch a

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.