Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4014880
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T09:33:02+00:00 2026-05-20T09:33:02+00:00

Here are two reasons to think strings are objects. First, you can create a

  • 0

Here are two reasons to think strings are objects. First, you can create a string in the following way:

var mystring = new String("asdf");

I’m under the impression that the constructor function following the new operator has to return an object. Second, strings seem to have properties and methods. For example:

mystring.toUpperCase();

BUT, if strings were objects, then we’d expect something like the following to work:

function string_constructor() {
    return "asdf";
}

var mystring = new string_constructor();

But it doesn’t, and I’ve been told it doesn’t because strings aren’t objects. So are strings objects or not? And, either way, how can I make sense of everything I’ve listed?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T09:33:03+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 9:33 am

    Speaking about language types, Strings are values of the String type.

    The language has five primitive types, which are String, Number, Boolean, Null and Undefined.

    There are String objects (also for Number or Boolean), they are called primitive wrappers, they are created when you use the constructor function associated with them, for example:

    typeof new String('foo'); // "object"
    typeof 'foo';             // "string"
    

    But don’t get confused with them, you will rarely need to use primitive wrappers, because even if primitive values are not objects, you can still access their inherited properties, for example, on a string, you can access all members of String.prototype, e.g.:

    'foo'.indexOf('o'); // 2
    

    That’s because the property accessor (the dot in this case) temporarily converts the primitive value to an object, for being able to resolve the indexOf property up in the prototype chain.

    About the constructor function you have in your question, as you know, it won’t return the string.

    Functions called with the new operator return an implicit value, which is a new object that inherits from that function’s prototype, for example:

    function Test () {
      // don't return anything (equivalent to returning undefined)
    }
    
    new Test() instanceof Test; // true, an object
    

    If an object is returned from the constructor, that newly created object (this within the constructor) will be lost, so the explicit returned object will come out the function:

    function Test2() {
      return {foo: 'bar'};
    }
    
    new Test2().foo; // 'bar'
    

    But in the case of primitive values, they are just ignored, and the new object from the constructor is implicitly returned (for more details check the [[Construct]] internal operation, (see step 9 and 10)).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here are two different questions but I think they are related. When using Git,
Here are two chunks of code that accomplish (what I think is) the same
Here's a standard scenario: if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(Configuration.AppSettings[foobar])) throw new SomeStandardException(Application not configured correctly, bozo.); The problem
Here are two questions related to modifying the data source for strongly typed dataset
If you want to associate some constant value with a class, here are two
Here's the thing: I have two applications, written in C++ and running on two
Here is the scenario: I have two asp pages. a.aspx is layout and b.aspx
Here's the deal: I got two db models, let's say ShoppingCart and Order .
Here's my problem - I'd like to communicate between two websites and I'm looking
Referenced here and here ...Why would I use two's complement over an epsilon method?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.