Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 398231
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T16:43:41+00:00 2026-05-12T16:43:41+00:00

Here is a subset of the Python grammar: single_input: NEWLINE | simple_stmt | compound_stmt

  • 0

Here is a subset of the Python grammar:

single_input: NEWLINE | simple_stmt | compound_stmt NEWLINE

stmt: simple_stmt | compound_stmt
simple_stmt: small_stmt (';' small_stmt)* [';'] NEWLINE

small_stmt: pass_stmt
pass_stmt: 'pass'

compound_stmt: if_stmt
if_stmt: 'if' test ':' suite ('elif' test ':' suite)* ['else' ':' suite]

suite: simple_stmt | NEWLINE INDENT stmt+ DEDENT

(You can read the full grammar in the Python SVN repository: http://svn.python.org/…/Grammar)

I am trying to use this grammar to generate a parser for Python, in Python. What I am having trouble with is how to express the INDENT and DEDENT tokens as pyparsing objects.

Here is how I have implemented the other terminals:

import pyparsing as p

string_start = (p.Literal('"""') | "'''" | '"' | "'")
string_token = ('\\' + p.CharsNotIn("",exact=1) | p.CharsNotIn('\\',exact=1))
string_end = p.matchPreviousExpr(string_start)

terminals = {
    'NEWLINE': p.Literal('\n').setWhitespaceChars(' \t')
        .setName('NEWLINE').setParseAction(terminal_action('NEWLINE')),
    'ENDMARKER': p.stringEnd.copy().setWhitespaceChars(' \t')
        .setName('ENDMARKER').setParseAction(terminal_action('ENDMARKER')),
    'NAME': (p.Word(p.alphas + "_", p.alphanums + "_", asKeyword=True))
        .setName('NAME').setParseAction(terminal_action('NAME')),
    'NUMBER': p.Combine(
            p.Word(p.nums) + p.CaselessLiteral("l") |
            (p.Word(p.nums) + p.Optional("." + p.Optional(p.Word(p.nums))) | "." + p.Word(p.nums)) +
                p.Optional(p.CaselessLiteral("e") + p.Optional(p.Literal("+") | "-") + p.Word(p.nums)) +
                p.Optional(p.CaselessLiteral("j"))
        ).setName('NUMBER').setParseAction(terminal_action('NUMBER')),
    'STRING': p.Combine(
            p.Optional(p.CaselessLiteral('u')) +
            p.Optional(p.CaselessLiteral('r')) +
            string_start + p.ZeroOrMore(~string_end + string_token) + string_end
        ).setName('STRING').setParseAction(terminal_action('STRING')),

    # I can't find a good way of parsing indents/dedents.
    # The Grammar just has the tokens NEWLINE, INDENT and DEDENT scattered accross the rules.
    # A single NEWLINE would be translated to NEWLINE + PEER (from pyparsing.indentedBlock()), unless followed by INDENT or DEDENT
    # That NEWLINE and IN/DEDENT could be spit across rule boundaries. (see the 'suite' rule)
    'INDENT': (p.LineStart() + p.Optional(p.Word(' '))).setName('INDENT'),
    'DEDENT': (p.LineStart() + p.Optional(p.Word(' '))).setName('DEDENT')
}

terminal_action is a function that returns the corresponding parsing action, depending on its arguments.

I am aware of the pyparsing.indentedBlock helper function, but I am can’t figure out how to adopt that to a grammar without the PEER token.

(Look at the pyparsing souce code to see what I am talking about)

You can see my full source code here: http://pastebin.ca/1609860

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T16:43:41+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 4:43 pm

    There are a couple of examples on the pyparsing wiki Examples page that could give you some insights:

    • pythonGrammarParser.py
    • indentedGrammarExample.py

    To use pyparsing’s indentedBlock, I think you would define suite as:

    indentstack = [1]
    suite = indentedBlock(stmt, indentstack, True)
    

    Note that indentedGrammarExample.py pre-dates the inclusion of indentedBlock in pyparsing, so does its own implemention of indent parsing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's a basic regex technique that I've never managed to remember. Let's say I'm
Here's a problem I ran into recently. I have attributes strings of the form
Here is the issue I am having: I have a large query that needs
Here's my scenario - I have an SSIS job that depends on another prior
Here is a simplification of my database: Table: Property Fields: ID, Address Table: Quote
Here is my code, which takes two version identifiers in the form 1, 5,
Here's a coding problem for those that like this kind of thing. Let's see
Here is the scenario: I'm writing an app that will watch for any changes
Here's an interesting problem. On a recently installed Server 2008 64bit I opened IE
Here we go again, the old argument still arises... Would we better have a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.