Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3226350
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T16:26:44+00:00 2026-05-17T16:26:44+00:00

Here is my current swap code for swapping 2 KeyValuePair objects in an array:

  • 0

Here is my current swap code for swapping 2 KeyValuePair objects in an array:

KeyValuePair<int, T> t = a[i];
            a[i] = a[j];
            a[j] = t;

Would there be any speed advantage to using unsafe code and merely swapping the pointers of the 2 objects? Or does the complier effectively boil this safe code down to effectively doing just that?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T16:26:44+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 4:26 pm

    No, it won’t be any faster.

    This is premature micro-optimization at its worst.

    In fact, it will be orders of magnitude slower, since you’ll need to pin the array (using the fixed keyword) in order to get a pointer to it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here is my current xpath code /html/head/title . But you know, in the real
Here is my current code. I'm trying to display data from three separate queries
I been trying to do the question title. Here is my current code: Main.java
Here is my current question: I'm guessing that my problem (described below) is being
Here's my current SQL statement: SEARCH_ALBUMS_SQL = SELECT * FROM albums WHERE title LIKE
Here is the updated question: the current query is doing something like: $sql1 =
Here is my code, which takes two version identifiers in the form 1, 5,
I want to swap two xml elements. How do i do this? Here is
Is there a PHP function that will do the following: Move a specified array
Here's my current if/else statement: var current_class = $(this).closest(article).attr(class) if (current_class == 'opened') {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.