Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6680351
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T04:27:54+00:00 2026-05-26T04:27:54+00:00

Here is the code that works fine : template<typename… Args> struct count; template<> struct

  • 0

Here is the code that works fine :

template<typename... Args> struct count;

template<>
struct count<> {
static const int value = 0;
};

template<typename T, typename... Args>
struct count<T, Args...> {
static const int value = 1 + count<Args...>::value;
};

now i was wondering why we need to partial specialize the count class template?

Can we do something like :

template< typename... args> struct dd; // edited according to answer but now getting error redeclared with 2 template parameters which is point below with mark %%

template<>
struct dd<>{
static const int value = 0;
};

template<typename T, typename... args> //%%
struct dd{
static const int value= 1+ dd<args...>::value;
};

but this doesn’t works but why?

Any help is very appreciated 🙂

Edit : edited the solution according to answer.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T04:27:55+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:27 am

    With template <typename T, typename... Args> you can’t create a specialisation that omits T (i.e. dd<>) — the pack can be empty, but T can’t. So you declare the template as one that takes only a pack, specialise for empty pack to stop recursion, and partially specialise for <T, Args...> to unpack one type and create a new pack with (n – 1) types.

    As for the edit: you can’t define another template with different arguments but the same name, you have to specialise the already existing one.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here is my code that fails: bool Table::win(const Card &card) { for (int i
I've got some code here that works great on IPv4 machines, but on our
Here is a code excerpt from AspComet project that works with Autofac. public MessageBus(IClientRepository
I have a little bit of Javascript that almost works correctly. Here's the code:
I have a piece of code here that does not work despite me using
There is a weird code here that I need to make work.. can you
here is my code it shares the folder but that does not work correctly
Here is the code that cause me problem since few hours: TabItem newTab =
Here's my code that is not working: print To: ; my $to=<>; chomp $to;
I have a problem with the following code: template <typename U> class lamePtr {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.