Here is the hashCode() implementation from Java HashTable Class. What if the number of elements in the hashtable is huge and the hashcode exceeds the INTEGER MAX LIMIT -2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647 ? I assume hashCodes will be positive integers.
public synchronized int hashCode() {
int h = 0;
if (count == 0 || loadFactor < 0)
return h; // Returns zero
loadFactor = -loadFactor; // Mark hashCode computation in progress
Entry[] tab = table;
for (int i = 0; i < tab.length; i++)
for (Entry e = tab[i]; e != null; e = e.next)
h += e.key.hashCode() ^ e.value.hashCode();
loadFactor = -loadFactor; // Mark hashCode computation complete
return h;
}
No, not necessarily. They’re just integers. They can definitely be negative, and it’s fine to have integer overflow while computing a hash code. An ideal hash code will be spread uniformly across the whole of its range (
intin this case). Anything using a hash code definitely needs to take into account the possibility of the value being negative.