Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8079871
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T16:14:55+00:00 2026-06-05T16:14:55+00:00

Here is the problem: I have two columns in a table that, for each

  • 0

Here is the problem: I have two columns in a table that, for each grouping, should have the same order. I want to check that this is true for the existing data before I make that assumption going forward.

Some example data:

gid  c1  c2
1    1   5
1    2   7
2    1   22
2    2   38
2    3   40
3    1   4
3    2   8
3    3   2

As you can see, if I were to use
select * from table t where t.gid = 1 order by c1
the result would be identical, and ordered identically to
select * from table t where t.gid = 1 order by c2.
The results would also match for gid = 2.
However, if I were to do the same with gid = 3, the order would no longer match. because, in that case, ordering by c2 has a different result from ordering by c1.

I want to check the entire table to insure that ordering by either of these columns will have the same result for each value of gid. Oracle’s MINUS won’t work, as it doesn’t allow order by in the subqueries. My first try, which doesn’t work because of the limitations of MINUS, was:

select gid, c1, c2 from table order by gid, c1, c2
  minus
select gid, c1, c2 from table order by gid, c2, c1;

I am using oracle 11g if that helps with the answer.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T16:14:59+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 4:14 pm

    You might find difference in order in the same record by assigning row_number.

    with ordering as (
      select t.*,
             row_number() over (partition by gid
                                order by c1) order_c1,
             row_number() over (partition by gid
                                order by c2) order_c2
      from t
    )
    select *
      from ordering
     where order_c1 <> order_c2
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a bit of an architecture problem here. Say I have two tables,
Here's my problem: I have an unmanaged dll that I made.I'm calling one of
Here is my problem - I have 2 tables: WORKER, with columns |ID|OTHER_STAF| ,
I have a table with 4 columns. I want to be able to INSERT
NOTE: This is the simple version of my previous question that SHOULD have been
I have two queries that each, on their own, run pretty quickly (less than
I'm creating a new DB and I have this problem: I have two type
I have a question regarding the two additional columns (timeCreated, timeLastUpdated) for each record
I have a table that stores all the volunteers, and each volunteer will be
I have following table structure there is column vid in that i want entry

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.