Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7795211
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T23:00:29+00:00 2026-06-01T23:00:29+00:00

Here where I work we have a branch which is only used to check-in

  • 0

Here where I work we have a branch which is only used to check-in ongoing bugs and tasks. The small tasks are shelved and recovered in the next week, when they are checked-in.

We developed an auto-merge system where these small check-ins are all merged to all specific project Branches. Then, at the end of the project, it’s reverse merged into the main branch, thus going automatically to another project branches.

But, suppose I have a branch with Feature A, and another with Feature B. I need a third, with both Feature A + Feature B + Bug Fixes. I don’t want to reverse merge them as I don’t want to mess up the main branch (yet)

I’ve created a branch from Feature A, and enabled my auto-merge from "Feature A" to "Feature A+B". So every bug fix goes this way: Main -> Feature A -> Feature A+B. And every checkin within Feature A goes to Feature A+B.

Now I want to do baseless merges from "Feature B" to "Feature
A+B"
.

Is there a way to enable merging between them (within TFS) ?

I know it blows hierarchy up, and I know I can just perform x baseless merges through tf.exe, or three-way merge the files manually (or using any known tool).

But I’m not responsible for doing this, it’s another developer who got used to the Team Explorer interface and all, so it would make his life easier.

Now, now, I know a probable answer/comment will be:

"You need to revisit your branch structure, as something is wrong!"

If possible, put that with some tips, I’m currently trying to change that but I’m not sure what to do when we develop 2 separated projects that, all of a sudden, need to be put together.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T23:00:31+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 11:00 pm

    As I understand it, once you have done a baseless merge between two branches using tf merge /baseless, TFS remembers this relation and from then on any user can perform a merge ‘normally’ between the two branches.

    The catch is that the baseless merge probably will detect conflicts for every item, and you need to check in new versions of everything in order to create the relation between the branches for the items. So, using your branch structure and doing a baseless merge between FeatureB to Feature A+B, you must be very careful when solving the conflicts – if you simply select the target version, any FeatureA changes on the target branch will be overwritten with FeatureB!

    I should add that I haven’t done this all the way through; I had a similar scenario but bailed out when I realized that I needed to solve every conflict in detail. Our product is huge, so it wasn’t worth the time and the risk for us.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's the situation. Due to the design of the database I have to work
We have decided to work with the Insert Framework Here We'll most likely update
I have a piece of code here that does not work despite me using
I googled,I binged,I already have seen the other duplicates here,but none of them work
I work for a travel agency, they have a website, from here they want
Yes, I have searched and tried many techniques, but nothing seems to work. Here
I have a git branch on my production server which is centos. I am
I have a SVN Repository at my main PC, to which only I have
I have a local branch for day-to-day dev work in git. My workflow is:
We are having another discussion here at work about using parametrized sql queries in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.