Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7429761
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T09:01:34+00:00 2026-05-29T09:01:34+00:00

Here’s a bit of code that might seem like it would work: #include <cassert>

  • 0

Here’s a bit of code that might seem like it would work:

#include <cassert>
#include <limits>

enum test { A = 1 };

int main()
{
    int max = std::numeric_limits<test>::max();
    assert(max > 0);
}

But it fails under both GCC (4.6.2) and clang (2.9) on Linux: max() for enum types is in fact zero! And this remains true even if you use the C++11 enum type specifier to explcitly say what type you want your enum to have.

Why is this? And as for the C++11 behavior, is it something explcitly called for? I could find no mention of it in N2347, the paper on Strongly Typed Enums.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T09:01:35+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 9:01 am

    std::numeric_limits is specialized in the Standard Library “for each arithmetic type, both floating point and integer, including bool” (§18.3.2.1/2).

    Your enumeration test is not one of these types, so the primary template is used. Its behavior is specified by §18.3.2.3/1: “The default numeric_limits<T> template shall have all members, but with 0 or false values.”

    If you want to know the traits of the underlying type of test, you can use underlying_type:

    std::numeric_limits<std::underlying_type<test>::type>::max()
    

    Alternatively, you can specialize numeric_limits for test and have it return the values you want. This is not a particularly good idea, though.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's a coding problem for those that like this kind of thing. Let's see
Here is my code (Say we have a single button on the page that
Here's my situation. I've noticed that code gets harder to maintain when you keep
Here's my code: // Not all headers are relevant to the code snippet. #include
Here's a basic regex technique that I've never managed to remember. Let's say I'm
Here is the issue I am having: I have a large query that needs
Here's my scenario - I have an SSIS job that depends on another prior
Here is my code, which takes two version identifiers in the form 1, 5,
Here is the scenario: I'm writing an app that will watch for any changes
Here we go again, the old argument still arises... Would we better have a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.