Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 58249
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T17:49:06+00:00 2026-05-10T17:49:06+00:00

Here’s a curious one. I have a class A. It has an item of

  • 0

Here’s a curious one. I have a class A. It has an item of class B, which I want to initialize in the constructor of A using an initializer list, like so:

class A {     public:     A(const B& b): mB(b) { };      private:     B mB; }; 

Is there a way to catch exceptions that might be thrown by mB’s copy-constructor while still using the initializer list method? Or would I have to initialize mB within the constructor’s braces in order to have a try/catch?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T17:49:07+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 5:49 pm

    Have a read of http://weseetips.wordpress.com/tag/exception-from-constructor-initializer-list/)

    Edit: After more digging, these are called ‘Function try blocks’.

    I confess I didn’t know this either until I went looking. You learn something every day! I don’t know if this is an indictment of how little I get to use C++ these days, my lack of C++ knowledge, or the often Byzantine features that litter the language. Ah well – I still like it 🙂

    To ensure people don’t have to jump to another site, the syntax of a function try block for constructors turns out to be:

    C::C() try : init1(), ..., initn() {   // Constructor } catch(...) {   // Handle exception } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 68k
  • Answers 68k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer You can use the zfill() method to pad a string… May 11, 2026 at 12:22 pm
  • added an answer It depends:) If you're using standard http delivery and just… May 11, 2026 at 12:22 pm
  • added an answer Hmmmm.. using CGI escape, I found out that the character… May 11, 2026 at 12:22 pm

Related Questions

Here's a basic regex technique that I've never managed to remember. Let's say I'm
Here's a problem I ran into recently. I have attributes strings of the form
Here is the issue I am having: I have a large query that needs
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.