Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3604682
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T21:01:45+00:00 2026-05-18T21:01:45+00:00

Here’s a nice pitfall I just encountered. Consider a list of integers: List<Integer> list

  • 0

Here’s a nice pitfall I just encountered.
Consider a list of integers:

List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
list.add(5);
list.add(6);
list.add(7);
list.add(1);

Any educated guess on what happens when you execute list.remove(1)? What about list.remove(new Integer(1))? This can cause some nasty bugs.

What is the proper way to differentiate between remove(int index), which removes an element from given index and remove(Object o), which removes an element by reference, when dealing with lists of integers?


The main point to consider here is the one @Nikita mentioned – exact parameter matching takes precedence over auto-boxing.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T21:01:45+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:01 pm

    Java always calls the method that best suits your argument. Auto boxing and implicit upcasting is only performed if there’s no method which can be called without casting / auto boxing.

    The List interface specifies two remove methods (please note the naming of the arguments):

    • remove(Object o)
    • remove(int index)

    That means that list.remove(1) removes the object at position 1 and remove(new Integer(1)) removes the first occurrence of the specified element from this list.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

here is how i call the following function: List<decimal> numbers = new List<decimal>(); numbers.Add(210m);
here is my code, SiteMember class @OneToMany(mappedBy = member,cascade=CascadeType.ALL) private List<MemberThread> memberThread = new
Here is my problem.. I have the option to create(add) two new input fields,
Here is my error(if you need any more info just ask)- Error SQL query:
Here is the code I'm using inside my AsyncTask DefaultHttpClient httpClient = new DefaultHttpClient();
Here an example of my checkbox list http://jsfiddle.net/YnM2f/ Let's say I check on G
Here is the scenario: I'm writing an app that will watch for any changes
Here's my test function (c#, visual studio 2010): [TestMethod()] public void TestGetRelevantWeeks() { List<sbyte>
Here's the code require_once 'functions.php'; require_once 'cfg.php'; $mysqli = new mysqli($dbhost, $dbuser, $dbpass, $db);
Here the scenario is I have many .aspx pages if any page gives error,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.