Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8014139
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T19:50:28+00:00 2026-06-04T19:50:28+00:00

Here’s a problem scenario: I’ve got a C++ object that includes a Cleanup() virtual

  • 0

Here’s a problem scenario: I’ve got a C++ object that includes a Cleanup() virtual method that needs to be called just before the object is destroyed. In order to do the right thing, this Cleanup method needs access to the fully-formed object (including subclass data), so I can’t just call Cleanup() at the start of my own class’s destructor, because by the time my class’s destructor is called, the destructors any subclasses have already completed and they may have already freed some data that Cleanup() needed to look at.

The obvious solution would be to require the calling code to manually call my routine before deleting the object:

theObject->Cleanup();
delete theObject;

but that solution is fragile, since sooner or later somebody (probably me) will forget to call Cleanup() and bad things will happen.

Another solution would be to have a “holder” object that implements the pImpl technique to wrap the class, and have the holder object’s destructor call Cleanup() on the object before deleting the object; but that solution isn’t 100% desirable either, since it makes the class work differently from a standard C++ class and makes it impossible to allocate the object on the stack or statically.

So the question is, is there some clever technique (either in C++ or C++11) that I could use to tell the compiler to automatically call a specified (presumably virtual) method on my object before it calls the first subclass-destructor?

(come to think of it, a similar mechanism for automatically calling an Init() method — just after the last subclass-constructor completes — might be handy as well)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T19:50:30+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 7:50 pm

    You can use a twist on the PIMPL wrapper:

    class PIMPL
    {
        MyDataThatNeedsInitDestroy    object;
    
      public:
        PIMPL(Atgs a)
           : object(a)
        {
            object.postCreationInit();
        }
    
        ~PIMP()
        {
            object.preDestructionDestory();
        }
    
        // All other methods are available via -> operator
        MyDataThatNeedsInitDestroy* operator->() { return &object);
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here is the problem that I am trying to solve. I have two folders
Here's what I'm trying to accomplish with this program: a recursive method that checks
Here is a scenario: User installs .NET application that you have made. After some
Here is another spoj problem that asks how to find the number of distinct
Here is the issue I am having: I have a large query that needs
Here's my scenario - I have an SSIS job that depends on another prior
Here's a coding problem for those that like this kind of thing. Let's see
Here is the scenario: I'm writing an app that will watch for any changes
Here is my problem : I have a post controller with the action create.
Here my problem: @Assert\Regex( * pattern=/^[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9\]*$/, * groups={creation, creation_logged} * ) I'm using the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.