Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1038205
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T14:56:47+00:00 2026-05-16T14:56:47+00:00

Here’s a skeleton Makefile just to make it easier to describe the problem: all_tests

  • 0

Here’s a skeleton Makefile just to make it easier to describe the problem:

all_tests : unit_tests other_tests_1 other_tests_2 ... other_tests_N

unit_tests : set1_summary.txt set2_summary.txt ... setN_summary.txt

%_summary.txt : %_details.txt
    perl createSummary.pl --in $^ -out $@

%_details.txt : test_harness
    ./test_harness --test-set $*

So I have a test runner that produces a file with detailed results, and then a filtering mechanism to create a summary file.

Now, the test runner application returns an error code if any of the items in the test set fails, which will correctly abort the “all_tests” target and never invoke the other_test targets. However, I would like to run the details -> summary transformation unconditionally, since that is relevant even for a failed test run.

I’ve tried some different variants but the only method I could get to work was wrapping the whole command chain into a Perl script, storing away the result of the first command and using that as return value for the whole script.

But that does not feel like a very neat solution, especially since the “actual” command set is a bit more complex than what this skeleton shows. Do you know any purely GNU Make-based method to accomplish this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T14:56:48+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:56 pm

    You could have a special rule that invokes Make recursively twice, like this:

    .PHONY: test
    test :
        make all_tests ; make summary
    

    The only downside is that the exit status of the top make process will no longer indicate success/failure of tests, but you could even fix that if you wanted to by a little extra scripting using the $? shell variable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's a problem I ran into recently. I have attributes strings of the form
Here's a coding problem for those that like this kind of thing. Let's see
Here's an interesting problem. On a recently installed Server 2008 64bit I opened IE
Here I had a problem that I am adding contact from the address book
Here's a basic regex technique that I've never managed to remember. Let's say I'm
Here is the issue I am having: I have a large query that needs
Here's my scenario - I have an SSIS job that depends on another prior
Here is a simplification of my database: Table: Property Fields: ID, Address Table: Quote
Here is my code, which takes two version identifiers in the form 1, 5,
Here is the scenario: I'm writing an app that will watch for any changes

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.