Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8757243
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T14:15:25+00:00 2026-06-13T14:15:25+00:00

Here’s an example to illustrate what I’m trying to do: Suppose I have a

  • 0

Here’s an example to illustrate what I’m trying to do:

Suppose I have a one-to-many relationship between a Cookbook and Recipe, with fields ‘id’ and ‘name’ in both tables. Currently, searches return only a “name” field for recipes, so results might look like this –

RECIPES

  • result name 1
  • result name 2
  • result name 3
  • …

What I’d like to see, without making additional database calls or search queries using the sql_attr_uint for the foreignkey, is the following:

RECIPES

  • result name 1 ———- cookbook name for this result
  • result name 2 ———- cookbook name for this result
  • result name 3 ———- cookbook name for this result
  • …

I know of sql_attr_string, but this appears useful only when adding a single arbitrary string to each document. I need something like a sql_joined_field that isn’t full-text searchable, but is instead simply stored in the document with the appropriate value from the query.

Any suggestions are appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T14:15:26+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 2:15 pm

    I believe I stumbled upon the solution, having been a bit confused by the Sphinx documentation:

    All of the columns that are neither document ID (the first one) nor attributes will be full-text indexed.

    I took this to mean that no matter what, fields I placed in the sql_query would be full-text indexed. In fact, specifying a field as an “attribute” changes this behavior, in effect removing the full-text indexing of the field and instead just placing it in the document.

    To solve my problem, I simply wrote my JOIN in the main sql_query (since sql_joined_field doesn’t appear to allow one to specify it as an attribute) and set the field as sql_attr_string.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here is the code in a function I'm trying to revise. This example works
Here is an example: I have the generic type called Account. I wish to
Here is the problem that I am trying to solve. I have two folders
Here is the problem I'm trying to solve for my game. I have this
Here is my problem.. I have the option to create(add) two new input fields,
Here the scenario is I have many .aspx pages if any page gives error,
Here is what I am trying to achieve in PHP: I have this string:
Here is the Javascript I currently have <script type=text/javascript> $(function() { $('.slideshow').hover( function() {
Here's my scenario. I have two classes ClassA and ClassB . ClassB inherits ClassA
Here is an example: I write html code inside of textarea, then I swap

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.