Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 852449
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T07:35:48+00:00 2026-05-15T07:35:48+00:00

Here’s the sample code: var d = new Date(2010-06-09T19:20:30+01:00); document.write(d); On FF3.6 this will

  • 0

Here’s the sample code:

var d = new Date("2010-06-09T19:20:30+01:00");
document.write(d);

On FF3.6 this will give you:

Wed Jun 09 2010 14:20:30 GMT-0400 (EST)

Other browers tested; Chrome 5, Safari 4, IE7 give:

Invalid Date

I know there is limited to no support for ISO8601 dates, but does anyone know what and/or where the difference is in FF3.6 that allows this to work?

My thought is that FF is just stripping out what it doesn’t understand while the others are not.

Has anyone else seen this and/or getting different results from the test script?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T07:35:49+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 7:35 am

    ECMAScript 5th edition (see §15.9.1.15) adds some support for ISO-8601, and Mozilla has apparently jumped on it (they may even have been the ones pushing it). I didn’t think they’d added it to the constructor, and the support is supposed to be a bit simplified, but that doesn’t mean Mozilla can’t go with the spirit rather than the letter and take anything it can figure out — or thinks it can figure out. The actual format supported in the spec is YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ. Your sample date is not quite a match.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.