Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6610201
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T19:48:35+00:00 2026-05-25T19:48:35+00:00

Here’s the situation: I have a web-based ticket application, multiple users. One problem that

  • 0

Here’s the situation:

I have a web-based ticket application, multiple users.

One problem that might occur (and does happen in the old version I’m replacing) is that user1 opens a ticket, edits it, and saves it. But while he was editing it, user2 also opened and saved the ticked. The changes user2 made will be lost/overwritten by user1.

To prevent this I implemented a locking mechanism, it’s fairly simply:

  1. On opening a ticket the PHP script checks for existing locks.
  2. If it doesn’t find any, it locks & opens the document.
  3. In JS, setTimeout() and an XmlHttpRequest call to unlocks the ticket after 10 minutes (works w/o problems).
  4. I also set an unload event to unlock the ticket when closing/moving away from the window/tab

The problem sits in step 4: The unload event (& it’s friend beforeunload) just doesn’t work well enough to implement this reliably (for this feature to have any serious meaning, it needs to be reliable), many browsers don’t always fire it when I would like it to be fired (Like pressing back button, hitting F5, closing tab, etc. This varies per browser)

The only alternative I can come up with is using a setTimeout() and XmlHttpRequest() call to a php script to tell it the page is still open. If this “heartbeat” monitor fails we assume the user moved away from the ticket and unlock the document.

This seems horribly inefficient to me and quickly leads to many requests to the server with even a few users.

Anyone got a better idea on how to handle this?

It needs to work in IE8+ and other modern browsers (ideally, Firefox, Webkit, Opera). I don’t care about IE6/IE7, our organization doesn’t use those).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T19:48:36+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 7:48 pm

    Using heartbeat pings via XHR is the way to go. Depending on the use case you might also want to send them after the user stopped typing in a field instead of every x seconds – this would ensure the page being kept open but inactive would not keep it locked.

    If you send those XHRs after the user stopped typing, use one of the keydown/up/press events and a debounce / throttle script to send the request only when the user stops typing for e.g. 5 seconds and one every x seconds (in case it’s likely enough the user will be typing for a long time).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's a problem I ran into recently. I have attributes strings of the form
Here is the issue I am having: I have a large query that needs
Here's my scenario - I have an SSIS job that depends on another prior
Here's a coding problem for those that like this kind of thing. Let's see
Here I had a problem that I am adding contact from the address book
Here is another spoj problem that asks how to find the number of distinct
Here's a basic regex technique that I've never managed to remember. Let's say I'm
Here is the scenario: I'm writing an app that will watch for any changes
Here's an interesting problem. On a recently installed Server 2008 64bit I opened IE
Here we go again, the old argument still arises... Would we better have a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.