Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6028925
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T04:48:39+00:00 2026-05-23T04:48:39+00:00

Here’s what I’m trying to do. Create a parent with a OneToOne relation to

  • 0

Here’s what I’m trying to do.

  1. Create a parent with a OneToOne relation to a child
  2. The parent has to fetch the children using lazy loading
  3. If parent is removed, so is the child
  4. If the child is removed, the parent should not be affected
  5. The cascade update and delete has to be translated into DDL

class Parent

@OneToOne(mappedBy = "parent", cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
public Child getChild()

class Child

@OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
@OnDelete(action = OnDeleteAction.CASCADE)
@JoinColumn(name="parent_id")
public Parent getParent()

I’ve got point 1, 3, 4 fully working and Point 5 partially working, still need to solve how to translate the update part indo DDL.

Point 2 is the big issue here, with my current solution the parent does not load the child lazily. The child however does load the parent lazily, but inverting the annotations would mess upp the cascading (points 3, 4 and 5).

I’m very confused right now, hoping I’ve missed something obvious, so any help would be greatly appreciated.

EDIT: Code requested by Adeel Ansari

‘fetch=FetchType.LAZY’ has been added to class Parent, otherwise the same as above.

IParentDAO parentDAO = DAOFactory.getFactory().getParentDAO();

parentDAO.beginTransaction();
//findByPrimaryKey uses 'org.hibernate.Session.get(Class clazz, Serializable id)'
parentDAO.findByPrimaryKey(1l);
parentDAO.commitTransaction();

The resulting hibernate queries, one fetching Parent and one fetching Child:

Hibernate: select parent0_.id as id0_0_ from parents parent0_ where parent0_.id=?
Hibernate: select child0_.id as id1_0_, child0_.parent_id as parent2_1_0_ from childs child0_ where child0_.parent_id=?

Here’s the code for findByPrimaryKey:

public class HibernateParentDAO extends HibernateDAO<Parent, Long> implements IParentDAO {

    public HibernateParentDAO() {
        super(Parent.class);
    }
}

public abstract class HibernateDAO<T, ID extends Serializable> implements IGenericDAO<T, ID> {
    private Class<T> persistentClass;

    public HibernateDAO(Class<T> c) {
        persistentClass = c;
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    public T findByPrimaryKey(ID id) {
        return (T) HibernateUtil.getSession().get(persistentClass, id);
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T04:48:40+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 4:48 am

    I’ve been having a similar issue. There are a few different solutions, but all of them are workarounds.

    The short answer is: Hibernate does NOT support lazy one-to-one relationships.

    The long answer (workaround) is:

    1. Declare the relationship to be one-to-one on one side (child), and one-to-many on the other side (parent). Thus a parent.getchild() returns a set, yet it will be able to use lazy loading.

    2. You can try to have the parent and the children to share the primary key, but this would require you to alter the schema.

    3. You can try to configure a view in your database reflecting this one-to-one relationship.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's a basic regex technique that I've never managed to remember. Let's say I'm
Here's a problem I ran into recently. I have attributes strings of the form
Here is the issue I am having: I have a large query that needs
Here's my scenario - I have an SSIS job that depends on another prior
Here is a simplification of my database: Table: Property Fields: ID, Address Table: Quote
Here is my code, which takes two version identifiers in the form 1, 5,
Here's a coding problem for those that like this kind of thing. Let's see
Here is the scenario: I'm writing an app that will watch for any changes
Here's an interesting problem. On a recently installed Server 2008 64bit I opened IE
Here we go again, the old argument still arises... Would we better have a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.