Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 773055
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T18:54:13+00:00 2026-05-14T18:54:13+00:00

Hey Stackoverflow I’m working on my homework and I’m trying to reverse a circular-linked

  • 0

Hey Stackoverflow I’m working on my homework and I’m trying to reverse a circular-linked deque without a sentinel. Here are my data structures:

struct DLink {

 TYPE value;

 struct DLink * next;

 struct DLink * prev;
};

struct cirListDeque {

 int size;
 struct DLink *back;
};

Here’s my approach to reversing the deque:

void reverseCirListDeque(struct cirListDeque* q) {

struct DLink* current;

struct DLink* temp;



temp = q->back->next;

q->back->next = q->back->prev;

q->back->prev = temp;



current = q->back->next;

while(current != q->back) {

    temp = current->next;

    current->next = current->prev;

    current->prev = temp;



    current = current->next;

}

}

However when I run it and put values 1, 2 and 3 on it (TYPE is just a alias for int in this case) and reverse it I get 2, 1, 3. Does anyone have any ideas as to what I may be doing wrong?

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T18:54:14+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:54 pm
    current = q->back->next;
    
    while(current != q->back->next)
    {
        /* This code will never run, cause you guaranteed right before the while
         * that current == q->back->next .
         */
    }
    

    Update: What you need to do now, once you’ve reversed all the pointers (which seems to work now, judging by your results), is set your “back” pointer to back->prev.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 371k
  • Answers 371k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer To clear the file and open for writing: $h =… May 14, 2026 at 6:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Interface Elements has Sortables May 14, 2026 at 6:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need to look into closures. onreadystatechange is getting assigned… May 14, 2026 at 6:54 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.