Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3311912
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T21:55:56+00:00 2026-05-17T21:55:56+00:00

hi all: recently i’m working on make checkpoint on linux process and encountered a

  • 0

hi all:
recently i’m working on make checkpoint on linux process and encountered a problem,it looks like that when i munmap memory map of the executable to current process,the symlink /proc/self/exe is dead.what i want is to make this symlink pointing to a other executable(the one for my resumed processs),is that possible?i tried delete it and recreate, permission denied. english is not my native language, i hope i’ve made my point,thanx

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T21:55:57+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 9:55 pm

    No. /proc is completely managed by the kernel and does not allow changes like that.

    But you may be able to start a new process (with fork() perhaps) and map your memory snapshot into that.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I just recently changed out all my hard drives and in the process of
I used an application recently that was awe-inspiring. All the forms inherited from their
I use a cluster of about 30 machines that have all recently been reconfigured
I recently encountered a situation where my CouchDB instance used all available disk space
All, Recently I developed a code that supposedly is a thread-safe class. Now the
I recently noticed that some (not all) of my javascript and jQuery scripts wouldn't
I have recently realised that all of my media files that have special chars
I run my blog using Wordpress and all too recently became a big believer
I recently asked this question: Expose XML or Objects - thanks all for the
We recently were given a client requirement to encrypt all their data while at

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.