Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 555057
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T11:46:33+00:00 2026-05-13T11:46:33+00:00

Hi I’m having problems selecting the correct version of a templated class which has

  • 0

Hi I’m having problems selecting the correct version of a templated class which has an explicit specialization. I’m wanting to select a specialization using a derived class of the class used to specialize. The scenario is:

#include <stdio.h>

class A
{};

class B: public A
{};

template<typename T>
class Foo
{
public:
   int FooBar(void) { return 10; }
};

// Explicit specialization for A
template<> int Foo< A >::FooBar( void ) { return 20; }

void main( void)
{
   Foo<B> fooB;

   // This prints out 10 instead of wanted 20 ie compiler selects the general version
   printf("%d", fooB.FooBar() );
}

As I say in my comments there I want to see 20 being printed out because B is derived from A but 10 gets printed out instead. How do I go about getting the specialization called without resorting to writing a specialization for each and every derived class (my actual scenario has a lot of derived types).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T11:46:33+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:46 am

    —EDIT : NEW ANSWER Let’s make the original approach more maintainable.
    All the important choices can be found in the definition of Foo. It is supposed to be easy to maintain.

    #include <boost/mpl/if.hpp>
    #include  <boost/type_traits/is_base_of.hpp>
    #include <iostream>
    
    class A
    {};
    
    class B: public A
    {};
    
    class C{};
    class D : public C{};
    class E{};
    
    struct DefaultMethod
    {
        static int fooBar() { return 10; }
    };
    struct Method1
    {
        static int fooBar() { return 20; }
    };
    struct Method2
    {
        static int fooBar() { return 30; }
    };
    
    template<typename T, typename BaseClass, typename Choice1, typename OtherChoice>
    struct IfDerivesFrom :
        boost::mpl::if_<
            typename boost::is_base_of<BaseClass, T>::type,
            Choice1,
            OtherChoice>::type
    {
    };
    
    template<typename T>
    struct Foo :
        IfDerivesFrom<T, A,
          Method1,
          IfDerivesFrom<T, C,
              Method2,
              DefaultMethod>
          >
    {
    };
    
    int main()
    {
        std::cout << Foo<A>::fooBar() << std::endl;
        std::cout << Foo<B>::fooBar() << std::endl;
        std::cout << Foo<C>::fooBar() << std::endl;
        std::cout << Foo<D>::fooBar() << std::endl;
        std::cout << Foo<E>::fooBar() << std::endl;
    
        return 0;
    }
    

    —ORIGINAL ANSWER
    If you can use boost, you can do something like the following :

    #include  <boost/type_traits/is_base_of.hpp>
    
    template<bool b>
    class FooHelper
    {
        int FooBar();
    };
    template<> FooHelper<true>::FooBar(){ return 20;}
    template<> FooHelper<false>::FooBar(){ return 10;}
    
    template<typename T>
    class Foo
    {
    public:
       int FooBar(void) { return FooHelper<boost::is_base_of<A, T>::type::value>(); }
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.