Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6786063
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T17:12:04+00:00 2026-05-26T17:12:04+00:00

Hi I’m using this module pattern variant and I’m looking for the best way

  • 0

Hi I’m using this module pattern variant and I’m looking for the best way to get access to a parent object. I realise there is no way to know what parents an object has so I want to include some context in the constructor. I thought this would work but it doesn’t, any ideas?

$(document).ready(function(){ 

    var main = new Main();

});


function Main() {

    var one = 'hello';

    init();

    function init() {
        var data = new Data(this);
        var two = data.load();
        console.log(one+' '+two);
        data.output();
    }

}

function Data(context) {

    // public vars / methods

    var pub = {
        'load' : function() {
            return ('world');
        },
        'output' : function() {
            var one = context.one // <-- what should this be?
            var two = this.load();
            console.log (one+' '+two);
        }
    }

    return pub;

}

The output is:

hello world
undefined world
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T17:12:04+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 5:12 pm

    When you call a constructor function with the new operator, you are basically doing something like

    function Main(){
        var this = //magic new object
                   //provided by the runtime
    
        //your code comes here
    
        return this;
        //because your Data function returns a value,
        // you never get to this line. Perhaps you should use
        // a regular non-constructor data() function instead?
    }
    

    When you declare a private variable with var it will just be a plain variable and nothing else. If you want to add things to the this you need to do so explicitely

    this.one = 'hello';
    

    But that is not all! this is not lexically scoped so the init function gets its own other this that is unrelated to the this from outside (this explains the undefined you get). When you want to use this in an inner function you need to do a workaround, like in:

    var that = this;
    
    function init(){
        new Data(that);
    }
    init();
    

    That said, just by your example I don’t see why you need to do all of this. I prefer to use constructor functions (and new) only when strictly necessary (when I want to make use of prototypal inheritance). In your case perhaps you can get away with a “less OO” approach?

    //main doesn't need to be a class
    // this is not Java :)
    function main(){
    
        //just a plain object for the 
        //context. Create a separate class
        //if you really need to...
        var context = {
            one: 'hello'
        };
    
        var data = new Data(context);
        var two = data.load();
        console.log(one+' '+two);
        data.output();
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm new to using the Perl treebuilder module for HTML parsing and can't figure
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.