Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7003133
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T21:01:24+00:00 2026-05-27T21:01:24+00:00

How can I abstract the Option type in the below Guice binding code, substituting

  • 0

How can I abstract the Option type in the below Guice binding code, substituting a generic parameter for Option?

ArrayList<Class<? extends Option>> options = 
 new ArrayList<Class<? extends Option>>();
bindMultibinder(annotation, options);

public Key<Set<Option>> bindMultibinder(
 Named annotation, ArrayList<Class<? extends Option>> contents) {
   Multibinder<Option> options = 
    Multibinder.newSetBinder(binder(), Option.class, annotation);
   for (Class<? extends Option> option : contents) {
      options.addBinding().to(option);
   }
   final Key<Set<Option>> multibinderKey = 
    Key.get(new TypeLiteral<Set<Option>>(){}, annotation);
   return multibinderKey;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T21:01:25+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 9:01 pm

    Thanks to Stuart McCulloch on Google Groups for answering:

    ^ the new TypeLiteral<…>(){} anonymous class trick only works when
    the type parameter is known at compile time.

    If you need to build generic types at runtime you can use the
    com.google.inject.util.Types utility class, for example:

    final Key<Set<T>> multibinderKey =
        Key.get( Types.setOf( superClass ), annotation );
    

    To get this to build correctly, I modified it as follows:

    final Key<?> multibinderKey = Key.get(Types.setOf( superClass ), annotation);
    

    So the complete generic method is:

    public <T> Key<?> bindMultibinder(
     Named annotation, Class<T> superClass, ArrayList<Class<? extends T>> contents) {
       Multibinder<T> options = 
        Multibinder.newSetBinder(binder(), superClass, annotation);
       for (Class<? extends T> t : contents) {
          options.addBinding().to(t);
       }
       final Key<?> multibinderKey = Key.get(Types.setOf( superClass ), annotation);
       return multibinderKey;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Can an abstract class have a constructor? If so, how can it be used
Can the abstract modifier appear before a class, a method or a variable?
Can an abstract class be used as the contract object between a 'Host' and
An abstract class can only be used as a base class which is extended
If a public constructor in an abstract class can only be called by their
How can I find the size of an abstract class? class A { virtual
How can I test a private method of an abstract class using reflection (using
What is an abstract class in PHP? How can it be used?
I can declare an abstract type such as type A[B] and in a subclass
Abstract: Can you propose a mathematical-ish algorithm over a plane of pixels that will

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.