Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7541949
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T08:01:51+00:00 2026-05-30T08:01:51+00:00

How can I achieve mutual exclusion using two named mutexes? The following code should

  • 0

How can I achieve mutual exclusion using two named mutexes? The following code should work but it doesn’t:

    [TestMethod]
    public void xdfgndygfn()
    {
        using (var mutex1 = new Mutex(false, "1234"))
        using (var mutex2 = new Mutex(false, "1234"))
        {
            mutex1.WaitOne();
            mutex2.WaitOne(); //this should block, but it doesn't
        }
    }

Using Process Explorer I verified that there are two mutex handles referring to the same name. This should work… What am I missing?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T08:01:53+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 8:01 am

    From MSDN:

    The thread that owns a mutex can request the same mutex in repeated calls to WaitOne without blocking its execution.

    Here is a test to verify this (the test will not complete):

            using (var mutex1 = new Mutex(false, "1234"))
            using (var mutex2 = new Mutex(false, "1234"))
            {
                var t1 = new Thread(() =>
                    {
                        mutex1.WaitOne();
                        Thread.Sleep(1000000);
                    });
                var t2 = new Thread(() =>
                    {
                        mutex2.WaitOne();
                        Thread.Sleep(1000000);
                    });
    
                t1.Start();
                t2.Start();
    
                t1.Join();
                t2.Join();
            }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How can I achieve the following? I have two models (blogs and readers) and
I want a rich text box control using which i can achieve following functionality:
I would like to know how I can achieve the following using the nginx
I code to ban system soft keyboard.It can achieve the effct,but it disappear after
Does anyone know how I can achieve the following effect in OpenGL: Change the
How can I achieve the following with a format string: Do 01.01.2009 ? It
How can I achieve the following with the Ajax Control Toolkit MaskedEdit extender? Letter
is there any way I can achieve the following in scala with new Car()
It seems to be common knowledge that hash tables can achieve O(1), but that
I know we can achieve this in VIM using nerdtree and gT and gt

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.