Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6679411
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T04:21:22+00:00 2026-05-26T04:21:22+00:00

How can I do the following in a more concise, pythonic way: for element

  • 0

How can I do the following in a more concise, “pythonic” way:

for element in some_list:
        if some_condition:
                element.some_attr = some_value
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T04:21:23+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:21 am

    The only thing that’s not pythonic in your code is that you’re not using 4 spaces for indentation.

    “Pythonic” doesn’t always mean “concise”; for example the following is shorter, but less readable than your loop:

    [setattr(e, 'some_attr', some_value) for e in some_list if some_condition]
    

    So, stick to the code you have.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a more concise and idiomatic way to write the following code, which
In other words, is there a faster, more concise way of writing the following
Is there a more concise way to do the following in iOS? Suppose we
I like that in PHP I can do the following $myInteger++; $myString += 'more
Could you guys please tell me how I can make the following code more
How can I write the following code more elegantly using LINQ query syntax? var
I bet the following situation can be more efficient by removing the part from
In migrations we can write in following way t.integer :escalated_by, escalated_to, query_id But I
I am looking for ways of making the following more concise. public class MyTests
How can the following function be implemented in various languages? Calculate the (x,y) point

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.