Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4041772
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T12:55:19+00:00 2026-05-20T12:55:19+00:00

How can I downcast a list of objects so that each of the objects

  • 0

How can I downcast a list of objects so that each of the objects in the list is downcast to an object of a derived class?

This is the scenario.

I have a base class with a List of base items, and two classes inheriting from it:

public class BaseClass
{
    public List<BaseItem> items;
    protected BaseClass()
    {
        // some code to build list of items
    }
}
public class DerivedClass : BaseClass
{
    public DerivedClass : base() {}
}
public class AnotherDerivedClass : BaseClass
{
    public AnotherDerivedClass : base() {}
}

public class BaseItem {}
public class DerivedItem : BaseItem {}
public class AnotherDerivedItem : BaseItem {}

The idea is to not have to duplicate the code needed to build the list of items. The BaseItem has all the basic stuff I need, and I can always downcast BaseItem to one of the derived items.

The problem arises when I have a list of them. The List of BaseItem is declared in the BaseClass because all the derived classes have to have it. But when accessing it at runtime I can’t seem to be able to downcast to the derived class.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T12:55:20+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 12:55 pm

    Using LINQ:

        var baseList = new List<BaseClass>();
        var derivedList = baseList.Cast<DerivedClass>();
    

    Note: Having to downcast usually is a ‘smell’ and indicates that the inheritance hierarchy is wrong, or wrongly implemented. The idea of having a base class is that you can treat all subclasses as superclass without having to downcast to individual subclass types.

    Instead of Cast you might want to use OfType to ‘fish out’ certain derived classes from a collection of superclasses. But again, there should be no need to do that.

    Ask yourself, why you need to have a subclass – maybe you need to move some functionality to base class?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Yes, I know that downcast using dynamic_cast can't compile if the Base is not
Base class MessageHandler has derived classes. They would like to pass messages to each
Can you set the internal [[Class]] property of an ECMAScript object?
Can multiple objects be linked (bound) to one name in RMI ? If that
You can upcast or downcast an instance (to a superclass or subclass) using this
Hi have one class like this import java.util.ArrayList; public class MobilePhone { private String
I asked a question an hour or two ago that is similar but this
I got a list of Objects of class-type B (B inherits from A). How
I have the following piece of code that I am wondering if it can
I want to force a downcast on a object what can't be down casted

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.