Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8097113
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T21:39:24+00:00 2026-06-05T21:39:24+00:00

How can I have multiple class constraints, so if A is an Eq and

  • 0

How can I have multiple class constraints, so if A is an Eq and B is a Num, I could say either

f :: Eq a => a -> b`

or

f :: Num b => a -> b

So, how can I have Eq a => and Num b => at the same time?

  • f :: Eq a => Num b => a -> b,
  • f :: Eq a -> Num b => a -> b, and
  • f :: Eq a, Num b => a -> b

didn’t do what I wanted.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T21:39:26+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 9:39 pm

    They’re usually called class constraints, as Eq and Num are called type-classes.

    How about this?

    f :: (Eq a, Num b) => a -> b
    

    The parentheses are significant.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a static class with a static method. Multiple threads can
In theory in layered architecture you can have multiple modules on the same layer.
User can have multiple messages: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :messages, :foreign_key => publisher_id
Using the following related models (one blog entry can have multiple revisions): class BlogEntryRevision(models.Model):
I have an element that can have multiple types (not my design). The element
I have a simple parent-child situation where the parent can have multiple children. The
In my application I have a customer who can have multiple locations. When you
I Have a Viewmodel based on Nominees . And i can have Multiple Nominees
I have a database with users and games. 1 game can have multiple users
I want to have a tree in memory, where each node can have multiple

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.