Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 377163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:40:10+00:00 2026-05-12T14:40:10+00:00

How can i make the following class as general as possible (for maximum reuse)

  • 0

How can i make the following class as general as possible (for maximum reuse) without creating too many classes of the same type, albeit with one extra property.

I want to avoid writing 3 slightly different versions of the same class

1# Class with No SubContent

public class Content
    {
         public string PageName { get; set; }
    }

2# Class with Subcontent

public class Content
    {
         public string PageName { get; set; }

         public IList<Content> SubContent {get; set;}    //same as class

    }

3# Class with sub content of another type

public class Content
        {
             public string PageName { get; set; }

             public IList<DetailContent> SubContent {get; set;} //Note the different def

        }

Of course i can create a generic class, but i find this confusing for consumers. It is inferring that the class is of Type T, when in fact its the Property that requires the type

public class Content<T>
            {
                 public string PageName { get; set; }

                 public IList<T> SubContent {get; set;} //Note the different def

            }

Generic Properties are not supported. So are there any patterns or suggestion on how i can handle this problem?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:40:11+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:40 pm

    What about

    public class Content
    {
        public string PageName { get; set; }
    }
    
    public class ContentWithSubContent<T> : Content
    {
        public IList<T> SubContent { get; set; }
    }
    

    and if you want to be able to access SubContent not knowing the actual type, you could use

    public class Content
    {
        public string PageName { get; set; }
    }
    
    public interface IContentWithSubContent
    {
        IEnumerable SubContent { get; }
    }
    
    public class ContentWithSubContent<T> : Content, IContentWithSubContent
    {
        public IList<T> SubContent { get; set; }
    
        IEnumerable IContentWithSubContent SubContent 
        { 
            get { return this.SubContent; } 
        }
    }
    

    that way you can access the SubContent property bypassing generics if you need to, by using IContentsWithSubContent rather than Content.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.