Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4105346
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T21:14:06+00:00 2026-05-20T21:14:06+00:00

How can we use an overloaded operator to prevent memory leaks in C++? Any

  • 0

How can we use an overloaded operator to prevent memory leaks in C++?

Any complete example..

Regards,

PKV

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T21:14:06+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 9:14 pm

    If you want to avoid memory leaks, don’t use delete.

    It may seem paradoxical, but the truth is that manual memory management is error prone, it is best to use automatic (or library) technics.

    In C++, for each object that you create, there should be a clear ownership. That is, you should be able to identify the object lifetime, possibly depending on some others.

    The first step is to avoid dynamic memory allocation: if you do not use new, you don’t have anything to manage — caveat: some library will hand you memory over and expect you to free it. Therefore, whenever possible, use the stack.

    Many use of new can be avoided by using the STL containers (std::vector<T> for example) instead of rolling your own situations.

    The second step is to use new sparingly, and to always hand over the memory to a single owner immediately after it’s been allocated. These owners include:

    • std::unique_ptr (C++0x) or boost::scoped_ptr, in a last resort std::auto_ptr.
    • boost::ptr_vector and the whole collection of Boost.Pointer Container library

    A single owner is easy to track down, and since the object’s lifetime is tied to its owner, therefore the object’s lifetime is easy to track down too.

    The third step is the delicate one, the introduction of shared ownership. It really complicates all reasoning around the object’s lifetime, and introduces the risk of cycles of references, which effectively mean memory leaks. They are required in some situations, but best avoided whenever possible.

    • std::shared_ptr (C++0x) or equivalent (std::tr1::shared_ptr, boost::shared_ptr)
    • std::weak_ptr (C++0x) or equivalent

    The latter is used to “break” cycles. However it can quickly become difficult to understand where to introduce the weak_ptr, even with a graph of the relationships.

    EDIT:

    As noted by Tobias, this idiom is known as Resources Acquisition Is Initialization (RAII), which is awkwardly named. A newer term is emerging: Scoped Bound Resources Management (SBRM) to describe a subset of it –> binding the resources to a scope.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way to use CodeDom to generate an overloaded operator in Vb.net?
I read that an overloaded operator declared as member function is asymmetric because it
I overloaded the << operator of a class. How do I have to overload
I'm working on a small memory tool which tracks allocations and deallocations, object sizes,
I have the following code: struct simple { simple (int a1, int a2) :
Before I start, I'm already aware that object immutability in Python is often a
Given the following: struct Foo { int bar() const; }; struct IsEqual : public
Given the following: struct Foo { int bar() const; }; struct IsEqual : public
I have a class with two definitions of ordering. (In the real problem, one
I've been wondering this for quite some time. There are already a whole bunch

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.