Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 367285
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T13:42:48+00:00 2026-05-12T13:42:48+00:00

How could I implement my own deferred execution mechanism in C#? So for instance

  • 0

How could I implement my own deferred execution mechanism in C#?

So for instance I have:

string x = DoFoo();

Is it possible to perform some magic so that DoFoo does not execute until I “use” x?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T13:42:48+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 1:42 pm

    You can use lambdas/delegates:

    Func<string> doit = () => DoFoo();
    //  - or -
    Func<string> doit = DoFoo;
    

    Later you can invoke doit just like a method:

    string x = doit();
    

    I think the closest you can get is something like this:

    Lazy<string> x = DoFoo;
    
    string y = x; // "use" x
    

    With a definition of Lazy<T> similar to this (untested):

    public class Lazy<T>
    {
        private readonly Func<T> func;
        private bool hasValue;
        private T value;
    
        public Lazy(Func<T> func)
        {
            this.func = func;
            this.hasValue = false;
        }
    
        public static implicit operator Lazy<T>(Func<T> func)
        {
            return new Lazy<T>(func);
        }
    
        public static implicit operator T(Lazy<T> lazy)
        {
            if (!lazy.hasValue)
            {
                lazy.value = lazy.func();
                lazy.hasValue = true;
            }
            return lazy.value;
        }
    }
    

    Unfortunately, it seems that the compiler’s type inferencing algorithms can’t auto-infer the type of the Func<T> and so can’t match it to the implicit conversion operator. We need to explicitly declare the delegate’s type, which makes the assignment statements more verbose:

    // none of these will compile...
    Lazy<string> x = DoFoo;
    Lazy<string> y = () => DoFoo();
    Lazy<string> z = delegate() { return DoFoo(); };
    
    // these all work...
    Lazy<string> a = (Func<string>)DoFoo;
    Lazy<string> b = (Func<string>)(() => DoFoo());
    Lazy<string> c = new Func<string>(DoFoo);
    Lazy<string> d = new Func<string>(() => DoFoo());
    Lazy<string> e = new Lazy<string>(DoFoo);
    Lazy<string> f = new Lazy<string>(() => DoFoo);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 213k
  • Answers 213k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You should set the mouseout to disabled = '' instead.… May 12, 2026 at 10:30 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If the purpose is to upload files, you can put… May 12, 2026 at 10:30 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes. If an object is truly immutable, with no internal… May 12, 2026 at 10:30 pm

Related Questions

I've been mulling over creating a language that would be extremely well suited to
I've been asked to display the 'correct' time on our website which I frankly
Using the iPhone SDK, I'm having the user select images from the image picker.
How could I go about keeping track of the number of times a word

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.