Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7175459
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T16:18:01+00:00 2026-05-28T16:18:01+00:00

How do I configure a workflow to expose a two-way void operation? So that:

  • 0

How do I configure a workflow to expose a two-way void operation?

So that:
1) caller is blocked until operation completes and
2) caller is notified on exceptions (faults)

Using Receive + SendReply seems clunky. For one it adds unnecessary noise to the workflow diagram.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T16:18:02+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 4:18 pm

    The Receive and SendReply pair is exactly how it is done. I agree that it adds a lot of unwanted complexity to you workflow. The best way to avoid that is to create a separate composite activity and wrap the Receive and SendReply in there. That way you see the simple composite activity on your workflow.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to configure a dedicated server that runs ASP.NET to send mail through
Is it possible to configure the Windows Workflow SqlWorkflowPersistanceService to use different SQL Server
How do you configure a custom workflow extension (such as a PersistenceParticipant descendant) in
I am trying to configure my TFS Workflow with the ProcessParameterMetadataCollection . I need
Given a workflow that I support, there is a high chance that there would
I have an application that has a designer component that creates WF workflow services.
Is it possible to configure an Entity Framework model so that, when creating a
I'm trying to create a build workflow for TFS that enables the following sequence
Is it possible to configure xampp to serve up a file outside of the
How do you configure tomcat to bind to a single ip address (localhost) instead

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.