Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7675717
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T17:01:30+00:00 2026-05-31T17:01:30+00:00

How do I make the following class threadsafe? public class Helper { private static

  • 0

How do I make the following class threadsafe?

public class Helper
{
    private static Map<String,String> map = null;

    public static init()
    {
        map = new HashMap<String,String>();
        // some loading stuff
    }

    public static getMap()
    {
       if(map==null) init();
       return new HashMap<String,String>(map);
    }
}

My ideas so far:

  1. Make getMap() synchronized.
    Problem: Makes the program slower than necessary, because syncronization is only needed at the start of the program and then never again.

  2. Use a lock. The problem is that the method “isLocked” which I use here doesn’t exist. So what would be the best solution?

    public class Helper
    {
     private static Map<String,String> map = null;
     private static Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();
    
     public static init()
      {
         lock.lock();
         map = new HashMap<String,String>();
         // some loading stuff
         lock.unlock();
    }
    
    public static getMap()
    {
       synchronized {if(map==null) init();}
       while(lock.isLocked()) {Thread.wait(1);]
       return new HashMap<String,String>(map);
    }
    

    }

P.S.: Sorry for the second source code display problem. There seems to be a bug with using code after an enumeration.

P.P.S.: I know HashMap isn’t thread safe. But that only means that I cannot write in parallel, reading shouldn’t be a problem, should it?

P.P.P.S.: My final version (just the inner class), following John Vint:

protected static class LazyLoaded
{
    static final Map<String,String> map;
    static
    {
        Map<String,String> mapInit = new HashMap<>();
                    // ...loading...
        map = Collections.unmodifiableMap(mapInit); 
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T17:01:31+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 5:01 pm

    I would delegate to a child class

    public class Helper
    {
        public static Map<String,String> getMap()
        {
             return HelperDelegate.map;
        }
    
        private static class HelperDelegate { 
               private static Map<String,String> map = new HashMap<String,String>();
               static{
                     //load some stuff
               } 
    
        }
    }
    

    Because class loading is thread-safe and occurs only once this will allow you to lazily initialize your Map.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given the following code: public class SomeClass { private boolean shouldBlock = false; private
I have the following class: Class L{ public: bool foo(vector<bool> & data); private: C**
I have a simple class like the following: class Record { public Record(string fp1,
I have the following model: public class Person { public string Name { get;
I have the following class: abstract class TheView { public $template = NULL; public
The following class: public class StaticMethodsDemo { public static class A { public static
I have a following model: class Car(models.Model): make = models.CharField(max_length=40) mileage_limit = models.IntegerField() mileage
Usually, when I try to initialize a static variable class Test2 { public: static
How would I make the following calculator Class work?: //Calculator.h #import <Cocoa/Cocoa.h> @interface Calculator
Just imagine you have the following class [DataContract] public class NamedList { [DataMember] public

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.