Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8647147
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T12:59:33+00:00 2026-06-12T12:59:33+00:00

How do I NOT parallelize local commands inside a task with @parallel decorator: @parallel

  • 0

How do I NOT parallelize local commands inside a task with @parallel decorator:

@parallel
def myTask():
  local('initialize localhost')
  run('command on remote host')
  local('clean up localhost')

I want commands on local host only to execute once, and commands for remote hosts run in parallel. Right now I’m seeing local host commands running for each remote host instance. What is the cleanest way to do this?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T12:59:34+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 12:59 pm

    Group your parallel commands into a decorated function. Then use execute() to call it inbetween the local calls.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I run across a lot of embarrassingly parallel projects I'd like to parallelize with
I have a question regarding local values in a parallel loop, and updating a
I want to parallelize a function using IPython.parallel, and when I define it in
I'm running multiple commands which may take some time, in parallel, on a Linux
Why does this code not parallelize std::for_each() when it works perfectly fine with std::sort()?
I'm interested in learning about parallel programming in C#.NET (not like everything there is
What is the proper way to parallelize a multi-dimensional embarrassingly parallel loop in OpenMP?
I've got a for loop I want to parallelize with something like PLINQ's Parallel.ForEach().
I am using openMP to parallelize a few statements. I am using the parallel
Not ever sure if it can be done, but is it possible to use

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.