Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 287203
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:42:17+00:00 2026-05-12T05:42:17+00:00

How do you unit test your code that utilizes stored procedure calls? In my

  • 0

How do you unit test your code that utilizes stored procedure calls?

In my applications, I use a lot of unit testing (NUnit). For my DAL, I use the DevExpress XPO ORM. One benefit of XPO is that it lets you use in-memory data storage. This allows me to set up test data in my test fixtures without having an external dependency on a database.

Then, along came optimization! For some parts of our applications, we had to resort to replacing code that manipulated data through our ORM to calling T-SQL stored procedures. That of course broke our nice testable code by adding a new external dependency. We can’t just “mock out” the stored procedure call, because we were testing the side effects of the data manipulation.

I already have plans to eventually replace my usage of XPO with LINQ to SQL; LINQ to SQL seems to allow me better querying capabilities than XPO, removing the need for some of the stored procedures. I’m hoping that if I change over to LINQ to SQL, I will be able to have my unit tests use LINQ to Objects to avoid a database dependency. However, I doubt all spocs can be replaced by LINQ to SQL.

Should I:

  • bite the bullet and change some of my test fixtures so they create SQL Server databases,
  • create database unit tests instead of testing the code,
  • or skip testing these isolated incidents because they’re not worth it?

I’d also love to hear about your alternative setups where stored procedures peacefully co-exist with your testable code.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:42:17+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:42 am

    The approach I use for this is to encapsulate the the logic layers from the calling of stored procedures behind another method or class. Then you can test the database layer logic separate from testing of the application logic. This way you can create separate unit tests for the client side application logic and integration tests for the server side (database) application logic. Given a piece of code that utilizes a stored procedure call as I have below:

    class foo:
    
        prop1 = 5
    
        def method1(listOfData):
            for item in listOfData:
                dbobj.callprocedure('someprocedure',item+prop1)
    

    It can be refactored to encapsulate the call to the remote system to it’s own method:

    class foo:
        prop1 = 5
        def method1(listOfData):
            for item in listOfData:
                someprocedure(item+prop1)
    
        def someprocedure(value):
            dbobj.callprocedure('someprocedure',value)
    

    Now when you write your unit tests, mock out the someprocedure() class method so that it does not actually make the database call. Then create a separate set of integration tests which require a configured database which calls the actual version of someprocedure() and then verifies that the database is in the correct state.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 488k
  • Answers 488k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Thanks, figured it out. $('a.next').click(function() { //remove and add selected… May 16, 2026 at 8:39 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer For this purpose a better database structure would be something… May 16, 2026 at 8:39 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need to reference and use the COM object "Microsoft… May 16, 2026 at 8:39 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

If you (or your organization) aspires to thoroughly unit test your code, how do
I'm trying to unit test some code that looks like this: def main(): parser
I don't know how you guys test your code every time you code a
How effective is the CXX test framework, given that you are writing unit test
I'm trying to understand what's the best way to manage older unit test that
How to make sure that code is still working after refactoring ( i.e, after
What are the current rules for writing python code that will pass cleanly through
Just some days ago I started looking into a unit test framework called check,
I am curious what strategies folks have found for unit testing a data access
Is it normal to have tests that are way bigger than the actual code

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.