how good is it to load/render repeating elements in a html page via JavaScript. I know a few(5%) of ppl dont have js enabled. So is it really worth it. I can get up to 15-20% reduction in markup and in turn page size by doing so
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
how good is it to load/render repeating elements in a html page via JavaScript. I know a few(5%) of ppl dont have js enabled. So is it really worth it. I can get up to 15-20% reduction in markup and in turn page size by doing so
If you care about page size, then turn on compression on your server instead.
Repeating content compresses very well, so your 15-20% is going to be a much smaller proportion of the page weight (and the HTML is probably going to be insignificant compared to any images you have anyway).
Avoid content generation with JS if you can, it is another point of failure.