Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5973609
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T20:49:26+00:00 2026-05-22T20:49:26+00:00

How in Qt would you keep a thread alive in the QThreadPool; as far

  • 0

How in Qt would you keep a thread alive in the QThreadPool; as far as I’ve seen there is only an option to run a QRunnable and I’ve been told they can’t control the thread they are within. How would I, using the thread pool keep a socket alive and ready to read and write?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T20:49:27+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 8:49 pm

    QThreadPool manages its own threads. QT Doc says that

    QThreadPool manages and recyles
    individual QThread objects to help
    reduce thread creation costs in
    programs that use threads.

    So you should not try to keep a thread alive. That breaks the purpose of thread pool.

    Also QT sockets are designed to work well with the main event loop. Why don’t you try using them ?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to keep the overhead at a minimum. Right now I have:
I would like to keep a static counter in a garbage collected class and
I would like to keep a list of a certain class of objects in
I would like to keep model binding when doing ajax calls from my view.
I would like to keep an item selected, on a ListView, when the user
I currently have a controller were I would like to keep track of logging
I have a small JSF app and would like to keep some state on
I'm playing with bencoding and I would like to keep bencoded strings as Java
I have various models of which I would like to keep track and collect
We have #1 and #2 spots we would like to keep, but because of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.