Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 613071
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T17:57:44+00:00 2026-05-13T17:57:44+00:00

How is it done? I have a Model class that is the parent to

  • 0

How is it done?

I have a Model class that is the parent to many sub-classes, and that Model depends on a database connection and a caching mechanism.

Now, this is where it starts getting troublesome: I have no control over how each object gets instantiated or used, but I have control over methods that get used by the sub-classes.

Currently I have resorted to using static methods and properties for dependency injection, as such:

class Model
{
    private static $database_adapter;
    private static $cache_adapter;
    public static function setDatabaseAdapter(IDatabaseAdapter $databaseAdapter)
    {
        self::$databaseAdapter = $databaseAdapter;
    }
    public static function setCacheAdapter(ICacheAdapter $cacheAdapter)
    {
        self::$cacheAdapter = $cacheAdapter;
    }
}

Which has worked out well, but it feels dirty (it creates a global state for all Models).

I have considered the factory pattern, but that removes the control of the instantiation from the sub-classes (how do I instantiate an object with a variable number of parameters in it’s constructor?).

Now I am at a loss. Any help would be appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T17:57:44+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:57 pm

    As far as I know this is a perfectly acceptable alternative. Another possibility suggested by Sebastian Bergmann, the creator of PHPUnit, is to have a $testing static property. You can read his recent article regarding the Testing of Singletons. It sounds like you have similar issues.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 337k
  • Answers 337k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I don't think there is a general term that describes… May 14, 2026 at 4:09 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I don't know what type of setup you have, but… May 14, 2026 at 4:09 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I stopped using serialization for deep copying anyway, because there… May 14, 2026 at 4:09 am

Related Questions

I am trying to solve a problem in Objective-C, but I don't think the
Let's say I have a model like this class Foo(db.Model): id = db.StringProperty() bar
I have a model Task which will HABTM many TaskTargets. When it comes to
I have an Account model and a User model: class Account < ActiveRecord::Base has_many
General Info: ASP.NET MVC app using ADO.NET Entity Framework SQL Server 2005 I have

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.