Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4533392
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T14:09:01+00:00 2026-05-21T14:09:01+00:00

How much less efficent would the linq technique be in the following case and

  • 0

How much less efficent would the linq technique be in the following case and could either be optimised?

Linq technique:

public String FindProviderName(Int32? TrueName)
{
    String providerName = (from p in this.Providers
                           where p.TrueName == TrueName
                           select p.ProviderName).First().ToString();

    return providerName;
}

Walking technique:

public String FindProviderName(Int32? TrueName)
{
    String providerName = String.Empty;

    foreach (IProvider provider in this.Providers)
    {
        if (provider.TrueName == TrueName)
        {
            providerName = provider.ProviderName;
            break;
        }
    }

    return providerName;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T14:09:01+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 2:09 pm

    If that is LINQ-to-objects, they’ll both be pretty fast. If you want faster, consider a Dictionary<int,string> and use TryGetValue(...). Obviously you need to pre-generate the dictionary, perhaps via ToDictionary().

    Note that the two examples shown are different when there is no match; one throws; one returns an empty string. Also, there is no need to call ToString() on a string.


    Re the faster version (comments); you need a field,

    Dictionary<int,string> lookup;
    

    And at some point prior to use (or after data changes) you need to populate it:

    lookup = providers.Where(p => p.RealName != null)
        .ToDictionary(p => p.RealName.Value,
            p => p.ProviderName);
    

    Then your lookup would be like:

    string providerName;
    if(realName == null ||
        !lookup.TryGetValue(realName.Value, out providerName))
        return null;
    return providerName;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How much less efficient would it be to store some fields as a BigDecimal
How much less libraries are there for Mono than for Java? I lack the
200,000,000 is much less than the maximum 32-bit INTEGER, 2,147,483,647.
Much like rtrim() to a string, how do I remove the empty elements of
Why is returning a std::pair or boost::tuple so much less efficient than returning by
I was wondering what would be a good way to accomplish the following using
Much like this question , I too am using Ryan Bates's nifty_scaffold. It has
Much related to this question , we have a scenario on my team where
Much I've read talks about the advantages of setting your UI up in IB.
Much of our C# release code is built with the 'Optimize code' option turned

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.