Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 117255
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T03:18:26+00:00 2026-05-11T03:18:26+00:00

How much less efficient would it be to store some fields as a BigDecimal

  • 0

How much less efficient would it be to store some fields as a BigDecimal instead of as an Integer in a Rails app?

Some computation (a bunch of arithmetic) will be done with these values.

Does this affect performance for Rails, the database or Ruby in general?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T03:18:27+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:18 am

    BigDecimal is less efficient than integer in most ways that matter. They take up more space, and floating-point math is slower than integer math.

    Having said that, unless you’re doing an awful lot of calculations, it’s probably fine to use BigDecimal, and you probably won’t notice.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

200,000,000 is much less than the maximum 32-bit INTEGER, 2,147,483,647.
Why is returning a std::pair or boost::tuple so much less efficient than returning by
So I don't know much about SQL or VBScript, much less putting the two
I had a similar question a while back, but with much less of a
is it efficient for the app to add a gesture recogniser to every cell
Much I've read talks about the advantages of setting your UI up in IB.
Much of our C# release code is built with the 'Optimize code' option turned
Much like how the video tag can provide multiple source attributes so an mp4
Much like the Stackoverlow reputation rounding, I'm hoping to do the same thing with
After much searching and googling I am coming back to the well. I have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.