Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8678207
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T20:39:25+00:00 2026-06-12T20:39:25+00:00

How much more efficient is it to replicate between 2 local databases on the

  • 0

How much more efficient is it to replicate between 2 local databases on the same CouchDB server instance versus between 2 databases on different CouchDB instances? Does CouchDB still use some form of IPC (e.g. sockets) to accomplish instance-local replication or does it resort to a more efficient method?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T20:39:26+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 8:39 pm

    Local instance replication (i.e. a replication where source and target are not identified with an URL), happen entirely inside the Erlang VM and are thus a lot more efficient. If either source or target are specified by an url, the replication happens over HTTP.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The title pretty much sums up my question. When is it more efficient to
I know Data.Text is a much more efficient way of storing string data than
I heard foldLeft is much more efficient in most of operations, but Scala School
I am working a much more complex version of this (with vehicle moving in
Code is much more precise than English; Here's what I'd like to do: import
I'm looking for a much more idiomatic way to do the following little ruby
Background: I am designing a software application that reads millions or much more files
Installed both SonataMediaBundle, SonataNewsBundle and SonataAdminBundle (and much more but these matter). When posting
I am fairly new to C++, having much more C experience. I am writing
I'm not too good with SQL and I know there's probably a much more

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.