Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 283765
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:24:04+00:00 2026-05-12T05:24:04+00:00

How safe is it to use UUID to uniquely identify something (I’m using it

  • 0

How safe is it to use UUID to uniquely identify something (I’m using it for files uploaded to the server)? As I understand it, it is based off random numbers. However, it seems to me that given enough time, it would eventually repeat it self, just by pure chance. Is there a better system or a pattern of some type to alleviate this issue?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:24:05+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:24 am

    Very safe:

    the annual risk of a given person being hit by a meteorite is
    estimated to be one chance in 17 billion, which means the
    probability is about 0.00000000006 (6 × 10−11), equivalent to the odds
    of creating a few tens of trillions of UUIDs in a year and having one
    duplicate. In other words, only after generating 1 billion UUIDs every
    second for the next 100 years, the probability of creating just one
    duplicate would be about 50%.

    Caveat:

    However, these probabilities only hold when the UUIDs are generated
    using sufficient entropy. Otherwise, the probability of duplicates
    could be significantly higher, since the statistical dispersion might
    be lower. Where unique identifiers are required for distributed
    applications, so that UUIDs do not clash even when data from many
    devices is merged, the randomness of the seeds and generators used on
    every device must be reliable for the life of the application. Where
    this is not feasible, RFC4122 recommends using a namespace variant
    instead.

    Source: The Random UUID probability of duplicates section of the Wikipedia article on Universally unique identifiers (link leads to a revision from December 2016 before editing reworked the section).

    Also see the current section on the same subject on the same Universally unique identifier article, Collisions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it safe to use MS SQL's WITH (NOLOCK) option for select statements and
I run all my integers through a (int)Integer to make them safe to use
My office has a central Source Safe 2005 install that we use for source
Assuming we always use a Sun JVM (say, 1.5+), is it always safe to
If I safe an Array and reload it, is there a possibility to get
In Visual Source Safe 6.0, you could reset a working folder by setting it
Is it safe to run LogParser against our live production IIS log file? Currently,
Is it safe to assume that two itterations over the same collection will return
Am I safe in casting a C++ bool to a Windows API BOOL via
Is it safe to assume that all implementations of org.springframework.context.MessageSource interface are thread-safe after

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.