Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 328277
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T09:28:48+00:00 2026-05-12T09:28:48+00:00

How to properly synchronize this? At the moment it is possible that SetData is

  • 0

How to properly synchronize this? At the moment it is possible that SetData is called after e.WaitOne() has completed so d could be already set to another value. I tried to insert locks but it resulted into a deadlock.

AutoResetEvent e = new AutoResetEvent(false);

public SetData(MyData d)
{
   this.d=d;
   e.Set();    // notify that new data is available
}

// This runs in separate thread and waits for d to be set to a new value
void Runner() 
{    
   while (true)
   {
      e.WaitOne();  // waits for new data to process
      DoLongOperationWith_d(d);
   }
}

Will the best solution be to introduce a new boolean variable dataAlreadyBeenSetAndWaitingToBeProcessed that is set in SetData to true and at the end of DoLongOperationWith_d it could be set to true, so if SetData is called with this variable set to true it could just return?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T09:28:48+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 9:28 am

    This is untested, but is an elegant way to do this with the .net based primitives:

    class Processor<T> {
        Action<T> action;
        Queue<T> queue = new Queue<T>();
    
        public Processor(Action<T> action) {
            this.action = action;
            new Thread(new ThreadStart(ThreadProc)).Start();
        }
    
        public void Queue(T data) {
            lock (queue) {
                queue.Enqueue(data);
                Monitor.Pulse(queue); 
            }            
        }
    
        void ThreadProc() {
            Monitor.Enter(queue);
            Queue<T> copy;
    
            while (true) {                 
                if (queue.Count == 0) {
                    Monitor.Wait(queue);
                }
    
                copy = new Queue<T>(queue);
                queue.Clear();
                Monitor.Exit(queue);
    
                foreach (var item in copy) {
                    action(item); 
                }
    
                Monitor.Enter(queue); 
            }
        }
    }
    

    Example program:

    class Program {
    
        static void Main(string[] args) {
    
            Processor<int> p = new Processor<int>((data) => { Console.WriteLine(data);  });
            p.Queue(1);
            p.Queue(2); 
    
            Console.Read();
    
            p.Queue(3);
        }
    }
    

    This is a non-queue version, a queue version may be preferred:

    object sync = new object(); 
    AutoResetEvent e = new AutoResetEvent(false);
    bool pending = false; 
    
    public SetData(MyData d)
    {
       lock(sync) 
       {
          if (pending) throw(new CanNotSetDataException()); 
    
          this.d=d;
          pending = true;
       }
    
       e.Set();    // notify that new data is available
    }
    
    void Runner() // this runs in separate thread and waits for d to be set to a new value
    {
    
         while (true)
         {
    
                 e.WaitOne();  // waits for new data to process
                 DoLongOperationWith_d(d);
                 lock(sync) 
                 {
                    pending = false; 
                 }
         }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 309k
  • Answers 310k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Its solved using IWin32Window only, problem was there were more… May 13, 2026 at 10:03 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer string[] arr1 = new string[2]{"Hello", "Stack"}; string[] arr2 = new… May 13, 2026 at 10:03 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It looks like if you go to the jrun.xml for… May 13, 2026 at 10:03 pm

Related Questions

The example at the end of hibernate section 5.1.3 does not show an example
I have a hibernate mapping as follows: <hibernate-mapping> <class name=kochman.elie.data.types.InvoiceTVO table=INVOICE> <id name=id column=ID>
MS Access allows the numeric type GUID (in German it's called 'Replikations-ID', so I
I am working on a small toy project who is getting more and more

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.