Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 75169
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T20:28:27+00:00 2026-05-10T20:28:27+00:00

How to solve Must be MarshalByRefObject in a good but multiple-inheritance amputated language like

  • 0

How to solve ‘Must be MarshalByRefObject’ in a good but multiple-inheritance amputated language like C#?

The problem is very simple, in several cases you just have to inherit from this class (infrastructure requirements). It does not matter here really, which cases. So, what do you do if you’ve already inherited from some other class (your domain model requirements)?

Btw good application frameworks, like spring.net always make sure you DON’T have to inherit from this class no matter what kind of infrastructure you need to apply to your class.

I would like to know what am I getting -3 votes here for?? 🙂

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T20:28:27+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 8:28 pm

    In general you only want to make an object MarshalByRef if you’re going to use it in a Remoting / WCF context. This is usually a special-enough case that it’s not a pain.

    Suppose you had a general type, and you wanted to derive from it and specialise it, and then remote the derived type – now you have a problem, because to be remoted an object must inherit from MarshalByRefObject, and your original general type didn’t. Suppose you can’t change it because you’re doing binary inheritance, or because it itself derives from a base class you can’t change? As the questioner points out, since C# (and .NET in general) doesn’t allow MI, you can’t inherit from both.

    The short answer is that you’re sort-of screwed. You either change the general type to inhert from MarshalByRefObject (or go far enough up the chain that you can insert it somewhere effective), or else you can think about mucking about with proxy objects.

    You could for example create an interface contract that describes your type’s interface, and then build a proxy type inheriting from MarshalByRefObject that also implements that interface by composition and delegation to an instance of your type (ie a wrapper). You could then remote an instance of that proxy type which would instantiate your type and do the work as expected – but all return types from methods have to be [Serializable].

    public interface IMyType {     string SayHello();     string BaseTypeMethodIWantToUse(); }  public class MyType : MyBaseType, IMyType {     public string SayHello()     {         return 'Hello!';     } }  public class MyRemoteableType : MarshalByRefObject, IMyType {     private MyType _instance = new MyType();      public string SayHello()     {         return _instance.SayHello();     }      public string BaseTypeMethodIWantToUse()     {         return _instance.BaseTypeMethodIWantToUse();     } } 

    Seems like a lot of work, though. Ultimately if you’re in this scenario I’d suggest a redesign or a rethink.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am using Haskell to solve problem 99 in euler project, where I must
I'm trying to solve the 3n+1 problem and I have a for loop that
In trying to solve the ajax back button problem I have found the Really
I was trying to solve my XNA Font problem , when I found this
I'm trying to solve this flickering problem on the iphone (open gl es game).
I'm trying to solve the problem of passing a 2-dimensional table into JavaScript AJAX
How can i solve must declare a body because it is not marked abstract,
I must say I have never had cause to use bitwise operators, but I
I must be retarded with searching, because here's another seemingly common problem that I
I need to programmatically solve a system of linear equations in C, Objective C,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.