Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 775219
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T19:15:18+00:00 2026-05-14T19:15:18+00:00

How would I buffer an IPoint to do an intersection check using IRelationalOperator? I

  • 0

How would I buffer an IPoint to do an intersection check using IRelationalOperator?

I have, for arguments sake:

IPoint p1 = xxx;
IPoint p2 = yyy;
IRelationalOperator rel1 = (IRelationalOperator)p1;
   if (rel.Intersects (p2))
    // Do something

But now I want to add a tolerance to my check, so I assume the right way to do that is by either buffering p1 or p2. Right?
How do I add such a buffer?

Note: the Intersects method I am using is an extension method I wrote to simplify my code. Here it is:

/// <summary>
/// Returns true if the IGeometry is intersected.
/// This method negates the Disjoint method.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="relOp">The rel op.</param>
/// <param name="other">The other.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static bool Intersects (
    this IRelationalOperator relOp,
    IGeometry other)
{
    return (!relOp.Disjoint (other));
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T19:15:19+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:15 pm

    OK, I found the answer. Or an answer.
    Use the ITopologicalOperator interface.

    IPoint p1 = xxx;
    IPoint p2 = yyy;
    ITopologicalOperator topoOp = (ITopologicalOperator)p2 ;
    IGeometry p2Bufferd = topoOp.Buffer (bufferSize);
    
    IRelationalOperator rel1 = (IRelationalOperator)p1;
       if (rel.Intersects (p2Bufferd))
        // Do something
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 387k
  • Answers 387k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Query ReportDatas .Where( reportData => reportData.StartsWith( "Something%" ) && reportData.Report.Id… May 14, 2026 at 11:57 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer First of all, I would highly recommend getting rid of… May 14, 2026 at 11:57 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer **/ordersearch* doesn't match /appname/ordersearch, you need /**/ordersearch*. May 14, 2026 at 11:57 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.