Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 49817
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:29:46+00:00 2026-05-10T16:29:46+00:00

How would I create the equivalent Linq To Objects query? SELECT MIN(CASE WHEN p.type

  • 0

How would I create the equivalent Linq To Objects query?

SELECT MIN(CASE WHEN p.type = 'In' THEN p.PunchTime ELSE NULL END ) AS EarliestIn,        MAX(CASE WHEN p.type = 'Out' THEN p.PunchTime ELSE NULL END ) AS LatestOUt FROM Punches p 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:29:47+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:29 pm

    You can’t efficiently select multiple aggregates in vanilla LINQ to Objects. You can perform multiple queries, of course, but that may well be inefficient depending on your data source.

    I have a framework which copes with this which I call ‘Push LINQ’ – it’s only a hobby (for me and Marc Gravell) but we believe it works pretty well. It’s available as part of MiscUtil, and you can read about it in my blog post on it.

    It looks slightly odd – because you define where you want the results to go as ‘futures’, then push the data through the query, then retrieve the results – but once you get your head round it, it’s fine. I’d be interested to hear how you get on with it – if you use it, please mail me at skeet@pobox.com.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 290k
  • Answers 290k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There is some discussion and an implementation here May 13, 2026 at 5:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer In looking into this a little recently I came upon… May 13, 2026 at 5:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Sample code: static void Main(string[] args) { string myvar; for… May 13, 2026 at 5:41 pm

Related Questions

I have an ASP.NET MVC application which is using Linq to SQL classes placed
I'm using LINQ to SQL and DataGridViews to create an editable user interface of
I have a legacy VB6 ActiveX control used in IE to provide control of
OK, so the @Ignore annotation is good for marking that a test case shouldn't

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.