Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 954281
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T00:11:26+00:00 2026-05-16T00:11:26+00:00

How would I design the tables for a matching system doing something like this:

  • 0

How would I design the tables for a matching system doing something like this:

We have X products which can have Y properties. The number of properties can vary from product to product and two products doesn’t have to have any similar properties.

My number one goal is to take one product and find the most similar product.

Normally I would do something like this:

create table products
(
   id serial not null primary key,
   name varchar(40)
)

create table properties
(
  id serial not null primary key,
  name varchar(40)
)

create table product_properties
(
  product_id int not null,
  property_id int not null
)

The only way I can think of is to loop through all products, fetch their properties in the loop and compare with the source product. But that doesn’t seem very effective.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T00:11:26+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:11 am

    Would something like this be any help?

    SELECT *
        FROM products
        WHERE id <> <given product id>
        ORDER BY (SELECT COUNT(*)
                      FROM product_properties
                      WHERE product_properties.product_id = products.id AND
                            product_properties.property_id IN
                                    (SELECT property_id
                                         FROM product_property
                                         WHERE product_id = <given product id>))
        LIMIT 1;
    

    This is intended to get the product that has the most properties in common with your original product.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.