Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8577223
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T20:06:40+00:00 2026-06-11T20:06:40+00:00

https://stackoverflow.com/a/8839647/462608 Use the static initializer: public class MyClass { static { //init } }

  • 0

https://stackoverflow.com/a/8839647/462608

Use the static initializer:

public class MyClass
{
    static {
    //init
    }
}

Can something similar be done in C++?
Actually, I need to initialize some variables, but I don’t want to create an object.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T20:06:42+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 8:06 pm

    If the variables are static members, not only are you able to initialize them, but you must initialize them.

    There’s no direct equivalent of Java initializer lists, but something similar can be done calling a function to initialize a static member:

    class X
    {
        static bool x;
    }
    
    bool foo()
    {
        //initialization code here
    }
    
    bool X::x = foo();
    

    This is for cases with intense logic. If all you want is to initialize static members, just do it similar to X::x.

    Actually, I need to initialize some variables, but I don’t want to create an object.

    If the variables are outside the class, initialize them directly (don’t need calling code for that).

    If the variables are static members of the class, use one of the above approaches.

    If the variables are non-static members, they simply don’t exist without an object.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Referring to this question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2035449/why-is-oop-hard-for-me class Form { protected $inputs = array(); public function
I was looking at this post: https://stackoverflow.com/a/2262200 and I have a very similar setup
As caf talked about it in https://stackoverflow.com/a/1113041/1354779 , there is a way to use
This question is similar in spirit to : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/492178/links-between-personality-types-and-language-technology-preferences But it is based specifically
As per https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3264227/relations-with-multiple-keys-in-doctrine-1-2 , I have two tables which (as I can't get it
I am referring to the question: https://stackoverflow.com/a/575889/292291 If I use integers as the key,
I went through this similar question at https://stackoverflow.com/a/7410228/880040 and the 6th thing to check,
https://stackoverflow.com/a/5524120/462608 If you want to call functions recursively, which lock the same mutex, then
https://stackoverflow.com/a/189778/462608 In the case of non-recursive mutexes, there is no sense of ownership and
From here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/2485177/462608 For thread-safe accesses to shared data, we need a guarantee that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.