Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 863419
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T09:18:24+00:00 2026-05-15T09:18:24+00:00

I added a ValidateValueCallback to a DependencyProperty called A. Now in the validate callback,

  • 0

I added a ValidateValueCallback to a DependencyProperty called A. Now in the validate callback, A shall be compared to the value of a DependencyProperty called B. But how to access the value of B in the static ValidateValueCallback method validateValue(object value)? Thanks for any hint!

Sample code:

class ValidateTest : DependencyObject
{
    public static DependencyProperty AProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("A", typeof(double), typeof(ValidateTest), new PropertyMetadata(), validateValue);
    public static DependencyProperty BProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("B", typeof(double), typeof(ValidateTest));


    static bool validateValue(object value)
    {
        // Given value shall be greater than 0 and smaller than B - but how to access the value of B?

        return (double)value > 0 && value <= /* how to access the value of B ? */
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T09:18:25+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:18 am

    Validation callbacks are used as sanity checks for the given input value against a set of static constraints. In your validation callback, checking for a positive value is a correct use of the validation, but checking against another property is not. If you need to ensure a given value is less than a dependent property, you should use property coercion, like so:

    public static DependencyProperty AProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("A", typeof(double), typeof(ValidateTest), new PropertyMetadata(1.0, null, coerceValue), validateValue);
    public static DependencyProperty BProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("B", typeof(double), typeof(ValidateTest), new PropertyMetaData(bChanged));
    
    static object coerceValue(DependencyObject d, object value)
    {
        var bVal = (double)d.GetValue(BProperty);
    
        if ((double)value > bVal)
            return bVal;
    
        return value;
    }
    
    static bool validateValue(object value)
    {
        return (double)value > 0;
    }
    

    While this won’t throw an exception if you set A > B (like the ValidationCallback does), this is actually the desired behavior. Since you don’t know the order in which the properties are set, you should therefore support the properties being set in any order.

    We also need to tell WPF to coerce the value of property A if the value of B changes, as the coerced value could change:

    static void bChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
    {
        d.CoerceValue(AProperty);
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 442k
  • Answers 442k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer From the Enterprise Localization Toolkit: <%@ Page language="C#" Inherits="Microsoft.Toolkits.EnterpriseLocalization.LocalizedPage" trace="false"… May 15, 2026 at 6:05 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Usually I use a windows account that is reserved solely… May 15, 2026 at 6:05 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think you will find that one Path is placed… May 15, 2026 at 6:05 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.