Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3321358
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T23:03:11+00:00 2026-05-17T23:03:11+00:00

I already have a CI build running on my Tfs2010 instance, but I’d like

  • 0

I already have a CI build running on my Tfs2010 instance, but I’d like to get a Gated checkin build running as well. There are subtle differences between the ways I would like these two builds would run, however. Specifically, I’d like the Gated checkin to not produce bug workitems on failure, not associate changesets and workitems on build, not move builds to the drop, and not maintain previous builds. Since builds initiated by Gated checkins are uncommitted changes, these steps seem unnecessary to me, but I would definitely like the CI build to perform these functions.

Unfortunately, there’s this NO_CI thing that appears on my changesets after they’re committed by the Gated Checkin build, and the CI build is never triggered. I found this thread that seemed to indicate that my DefaultTemplate.xaml should have a “Get Activity” NO_CIOption parameter in there somewhere; however nothing in the configuration file seems to indicate anything of the sort. Neither string is present, and I can’t find any reference documentation in the msdn library.

In fact, in the msdn library, there’s a page that seems to link to the page I want, however where the link would actually be there’s a misplaced, duplicate link to “Control where the build system places your binaries.” You can see the identical link directly below it.

Anyhow: how is the NO_CIOption parameter used in the build template files? Where is it placed? Has no anyone else ever wanted to do this before?

Side note: is it bad practice to cross-post between SO and the MSDN forums?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T23:03:12+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 11:03 pm

    To follow up on this, after looking through the Xaml and using reflector on the Build binaries, I found the NoCIOption property on the SyncWorkspace action. Setting this to false seems to have allowed CI builds to trigger after gated checkins, as well as removing the somewhat unsightly NO_CI checkin comment appendix.

    See http://donovanbrown.com/post/How-to-have-CI-builds-run-after-a-Gated-Build for information on how to do this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm working in a project that already have a build process running with maven
We already have the database with real data inside. Now we want to build
I have problem developing with live555. I already build the lib-files and example projects
I already have my azure web role running in cloud using azure sdk 1.6.
I have already built a site from scratch. It has banning, PM, comments, etc.
I already have an application built in asp.net 3.5 and now I want to
I have an already built application and I want to add a feature that
i already have a project with TreeNode class which creates a hierachy of nodes
I already have code which lazy loads scripts on request. My issue now is
I already have an enterprise Java EE application. I want expose some of the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.