Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8317311
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T21:33:47+00:00 2026-06-08T21:33:47+00:00

I already have used the Google CodePro AnalytiX but I never used Findbugs. My

  • 0

I already have used the Google CodePro AnalytiX but I never used Findbugs.

My first impression with Findbugs is that it is harder to configure. After that, I believe that both are similar.

What’s your opinion?

Just one more question related: None of these plugins sent our code to the servers, right? (for example, if we use CodePro our code isn’t sent to Google Servers).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T21:33:48+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 9:33 pm

    Update in 2016: CodePro Analytix is not available anymore, so go with Findbugs.


    Original answer

    better in CodePro Analytix:

    • Issue level (error, warning, info) can be changed for every item. Findbugs can only enable/disable issues.
    • Many issues can be configured in detail (like the list of blacklisted swear words).
    • Can show you all the issues in the currently opened editors (and adapts this when opening or closing editors), which is much more convinient then selecting packages, projects or whatever and then to manually trigger a scan on them
    • Several issues can be fixed automatically (like declaring all parameters final). In Findbugs everything must be done manually.

    better in Findbugs:

    • Is more concentrated on typical Java programming bugs (but does not have the rich selection of issues like CodePro)
    • does more analysises that need a lot of context information
    • can be used locally in Eclipse or on an integration server like Hudson/Jenkins
    • configuration on Hudson/Jenkins and in local IDE can be shared, so you see the exact same results in your IDE and on the server
    • has a “cloud mode”, where distributed teams can share their findings (and the evaluation of the findings), so that they do not all check the same issues again

    All of the above was more related to how you can work with the tool. The actual finding of bugs may depend very heavily on the project to be checked. In the past I often suggested to use both, Findbugs first, CodePro afterwards:

    Do the first checks with Findbugs, as it finds the more severe issues. But after those have been fixed, you may find yourself in lots of noisy issues (or even false findings). Therefore after working on the most severe issues of Findbugs, I suggest switching to CodePro Analytix as it has less false findings and can be controlled in more detail.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I used to configure boost already, but this time I have no idea what
I am new to OSM Map API but I have already used the Google
sending mail along with embedded image using asp.net I have already used following but
I have a Google Map (API 2) that used to work fine as a
This may already have been asked, but StackOverflow is massive and trying to google
I used to have a small chat app(which was almost working), that uses PHP,
I'm searching on Google but most of the results I'm getting have these complicated
I´m starting to develop Facebook Applications. I already have readen the FPP, but, it
Just to be clear from the start, I've never used Google maps in any
I am new to python and google app. I have an already created application

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.