Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1092021
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T23:37:12+00:00 2026-05-16T23:37:12+00:00

I already use some new features from C++0x in Visual C++ 2010, like regular

  • 0

I already use some new features from C++0x in Visual C++ 2010, like regular expressions or lambda functions.
But there is one major feature that is missing: the <thread> header.

Do you know any code which could act as a replacement?

For the moment I’m using boost’s thread, but it’s not exactly the same as the standard, and it gives me huge compile times. I also found just::thread, but being an amateur I don’t want to spend money on it.

I don’t think it would be too difficult to code (though I may be wrong) but I don’t know the Win32 API enough to do so.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T23:37:13+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:37 pm

    I have used boost::thread in performance-sensitive production code and it’s way more sophisticated and performant than anything we could have built ourselves in a sensible amount of time. The reader-writer lock in particular is a thing of beauty imo. You have the added benefit that the person who wrote the code and the book is active on Stack Overflow, if you do need help.

    Since you are on Windows you may be able to improve compile-times by judicious use of Visual Studio precompiled headers, to avoid repeated load of the Boost headers.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.